Cover of: analysis of collaborative research opportunities for the army | Carolyn Wong Read Online

analysis of collaborative research opportunities for the army

  • 775 Want to read
  • ·
  • 25 Currently reading

Published by Rand in Santa Monica, Calif .
Written in English



  • United States.


  • United States. Army.,
  • Military research -- United States.,
  • Research and development partnership -- United States.

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementCarolyn Wong.
ContributionsArroyo Center., United States. Army.
LC ClassificationsU393 .W66 1998
The Physical Object
Paginationxviii, 36 p. ;
Number of Pages36
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL674606M
ISBN 100833025066
LC Control Number97020770

Download analysis of collaborative research opportunities for the army


An Analysis of Collaborative Research Opportunities for the Army Author: Carolyn Wong Subject: The Arroyo Center has developed a methodology to identify opportunities for the Army to use collaboration with industry to more effectively achieve its research and development goals. Created Date: 5/22/ AM. A Review of Team Collaboration Tools Used In the Military and Government Submitted To: Dr. Michael Letsky Office of Naval Research Code North Quincy Street Arlington, VA Prepared By: George Edw. Seymour Code SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego, CA [email protected] Michael B. Cowen Code Cited by: 3. 2. Collaboration in the Military Decision Making Environment As a foundation for this paper's discussion, a definition of collaboration is a necessity. Turning to a generic definition provided by William A. Kraus, collaboration, at its most basic level can be considered " a cooperative venture based on shared power and authority." [Kraus, 19]File Size: 73KB. NHG RCR: Chapter 7. Collaborative Research 56 of collaborative research that involves researchers working across disciplines, either within an institution or in different institutions. A physician working with an engineer to manufacture a new imaging device, or an epidemiologist working with a political.

The true partnership ideal and emergent inquiry process make collaborative research complex and difficult to organize, lead, and manage. This book addresses these needs by revisiting traditional research ideals. Collaborative Research in Organizations is organized in four sections. Part I, Framing the Challenge, provides grounding in the. This handbook provides the latest thinking, methodologies and cases in the rapidly growing area of collaborative management research. What makes collaborative management research different is its emphasis on creating a close partnership between scholars and practitioners in the search for knowledge concerning organizations and complex systems. Adequate supervision and coordination of the research program requires a substantial increase in scientific personnel. To plan and direct the research program of the Army to insure maximum utilization of the available scientific talent and to insure a dynamic program responsive to the future requirements of the Army. Roschelle () frames collaboration as an exercise in convergence or construction of shared meanings and notes that research on conversational analysis has identified features of interactions that enable participants to reach convergence through the construction, monitoring, and repairing of File Size: KB.

Collaborative Science Research collaborations occur more frequently today than they did in the past due to a growing likelihood of research funding for interdisciplinary projects and advances in communication technologies. Published: The single most important or1gm of today's AirLand Battle doctrine was the establishment of the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) in and the writing of a wholly new Field Manual (FM) , Operations, under the supervision of the first TRADOC commander, General William E. DePuy. Analysis Of Collaborative Work Downloads 6 Pages / 1, Words Add in library Click this icon and make it bookmark in your library to refer it later. The Nation’s Premier Laboratory for Land Forces. Analyze and improve Army technologies and systems to: (1) Increase survivability, lethality, effectiveness, and human-system integration; (2) Provide accurate and detailed awareness of materiel capabilities; and (3) Provide a powerful shared toolset that simplifies and improves Army decision making.